Exercise 4.1 Fragments

Brief:- In this first exercise, you’ll use fragments of still life images to create a combined design. Arrange a still life set-up that includes a background (preferably an ironed white or black sheet) and three distinct objects. It would be helpful if at least one object was sized at least 0.5m or you’ll be photographing everything in macro. Use either sunlight from a window or one single source of electric light to cast shadows and bring out the 3D form of the objects. Photograph around the objects, both close and wide shots, not all from the front. Capture the edges and the lines of the objects as well as defined shapes within them – for example the sound holes of a violin. Capture edges where light and shadow create a sense of depth or recess. Take pictures of the textures and colours of the objects. Think of this project as collecting impressions and perceptions of these objects and let this guide your camera. You’ll need approximately 20 well-exposed images.

The idea behind this exercise is to imaginatively combine the different photographs into a single conclusive design. Have a look at some Cubist paintings and sculpture as inspiration. Notice how one object blends into another and how different viewpoints of the same object co-exist in surprising ways. The classic example of this is Picasso’s combination of the front and profile of a face, as in Weeping Woman, which you can see on the Tate’s website. Then look at Brendan Fowler’s Spring 2011 – Fall 2012 on the New York Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) website, which attempts similar arrangements with photography.

Weeping Woman by Picasso (1881 – 1973)

Fig. 1. Weeping Woman (1937)

The red, green and purple outlines are marks which I have made for the purpose of annotation. The original can be seen here.

  • Red: – Profile view.
  • Green:- Front view.
  • Purple:- Triangles.

The combination of the frontal and profile view are quite apparent in Weeping Woman, and this painting is evidence that art does not need to be literal for it to make sense. I have used the purple to highlight some of the triangles that Picasso has used throughout the image. They become a visual anchor and can also be found in the womans hat and coat. As part of the head they provide definition to the collar and neck, chin, and movement of the tears. Also of note are the two hands, to the left and  right of the mouth. They are both of the left hand and also shown from differing perspectives.

Swinging by Wassily Kandinsky (1866 – 1944)

Fig. 2. Swinging (1925)

This wonderful painting by Kandinsky is relevent to the brief because of how the lines and edges of the shapes fit together to produce the overall effect. I am aware how easy it is to anthropomorphise, but I can only say what I see. To me, the shapes and colours, as separate elements, combine to become a man who is smoking, sitting down with a blanket over his legs. There is a lamp both in front of and behind him, and he is thinking deeply (highlighted by the yellow triangle above his head with the stream of consciousness flowing out from this). Is this a representation of Einstein? Did their paths cross when Kandinsky was living in Germany?

Brendan Fowler (1978)

Fig. 3. Joel’s Phone on Lauro Table 1, “Looking at Richter Photo With Carol and Roberto” on Computer 2, Pots in Patty’s Window 1, Looking at Richter Photo with Carol and Roberto 1 (2010)

Fowlers photography is certainly abstract and novel, and I can see the connection between his photography and the brief. There are some lines that connect with each other, and these provide a minor similarity with the work of Kandinsky, but only slightly. I think that rather than drawing any comparisons between the work of Kandinsky and Picasso, they should be viewed as stand alone abstract photography. The photo above is one of the better ones in relation to overlapping lines, and his way of creating layers is a new idea for me to consider. The layers, which are created in the physical form, rather than in digital editing software, have a solidity and strength to them, and without the reductionism that generally happens when I or others reduce opacity in Photoshop.. Neither way is better, but it’s nice to have an alternate way of creating layers.


Figure 1 Picasso, P; 1937; Femme en pleurs (Weeping woman) [Oil paint on canvas]; AT: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/picasso-weeping-woman-t05010 (accessed on 11/09/2018)

Figure 2 Kandinsky, W; 1925; Schaukeln (Swinging) [Oil paint on board]; AT: https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/kandinsky-swinging-t02344 (accessed on 11/09/2018)

Figure 3 Fowler, B; 2010; Joel’s Phone on Lauro Table 1, “Looking at Richter Photo With Carol and Roberto” on Computer 2, Pots in Patty’s Window 1, Looking at Richter Photo with Carol and Roberto 1 [Pigmented inkjet prints with acrylic, wooden frames]; AT: https://www.moma.org/interactives/exhibitions/2013/newphotography/brendan-fowler/2_fowler/index.html (accessed on 12/09/2018)

12 Replies to “Exercise 4.1 Fragments”

  1. Love the Kandinsky – for the colors and shapes and the energy – it took me a lot of looking to see the pattern – I am always just delighted with the overall impact of his work. Not being a photographer or photography student I’m not sure I understand this assignment – (I hope you are feeling stronger.)

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thankyou Grace. It’s been a hard week, but I’m getting there.

      The assignment is basically to create a photo in the style of Kandinsky or Picasso by layering several photos. I’m making the photos today, so hopefully will have the exercise posted on Saturday or Sunday.

      How are you?

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I am anxious, edgy, testy and all of that but for reasons that are up-beat – the up-coming reno – so basically, I am very well. So many details that if they don’t all come together will be a major PITA but a reno is a good and happy thing – in the end.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I can’t reply directly to your comment re: the kitchen reno – my old blogging friends want to see photos and I have taken photos of the current/old kitchen but really it’s boring – it’s a small kitchen and they will be demoing the whole thing – everything goes – everything except the floors new (I couldn’t afford new floors). The new kitchen is going to be very, very basic and boring LOL but it will be more efficient including smaller appliances, no dishwasher (I never use the darn thing) but more counter space and so much storage thant I will never use because I don’t have a lot of stuff. It’s just my husband and I and we are making it work for US. The only splurge is the backsplash – kinda glittery.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.